ANAC logo
Red Rule
Associated New American Colleges
At the Woodrow Wilson
National Fellowship Foundation

Data Exchange
ANAC Directory
ANAC Home Page
Faculty Work Project
Listservs & Forums
Upcoming ANAC Events
Help Net
ANAC Bulletin
ANAC Bulletin Masthead
Red Rule Fall 2001 Edition

Commentary: Featuring Frank H.T. Rhodes


"A
s we enter a new century, society's agreement on what defines an educated person, what constitutes essential knowledge and common discourse, has essentially collapsed. Simply stated, faculty members must recapture the curriculum... In fact the greatest privilege a faculty member can have is to design and support a curriculum."

—Former President Frank H. T. Rhodes,
   Cornell University

 

Rhodes on the "New American University"


Former Cornell University President Frank H.T. Rhodes has written recently on issues with a special relevance to ANAC members. His 1999 chapter, "The New University," in Challenges Facing Higher Education at the Millennium, edited by W. Hirsh and L. Weber (Oryx Press), articulates eight characteristics he associates with the best research universities in the 21st century. These qualities resonate to some extent with ways ANAC members have sought to differentiate our largely Carnegie Master's comprehensive model:

  1. Institutional autonomy, lively faculty independence, and vigorous academic freedom, but strong, impartial, public governance and decisive, engaged presidential leadership.
  2. Increasingly privately supported, but increasingly publicly accountable and socially committed.
  3. Campus rooted, but internationally oriented.
  4. Academically independent, but constructively partnered.
  5. Knowledge-based, but student-oriented; research-driven, but learner-focused.
  6. Technologically sophisticated, but community dependent.
  7. Quality-obsessed, but procedurally efficient.
  8. Professionally attuned, but humanely informed.

Rhodes on Faculty and the Curriculum


Provost JoAnn Haysbert (r) of Hampton University in curricular conversation with Arcelia Johnson Fannin, Dean of Pharmacy.
In the lead article in The Chronicle Review of September 14, Rhodes urged a rethinking of the undergraduate curriculum. Arguing, "As we enter a new century, society's agreement on what defines an educated person, what constitutes essential knowledge and common discourse, has essentially collapsed," he puts the onus directly on faculty. "Simply stated, faculty members must recapture the curriculum . . .In fact the greatest privilege a faculty member can have is to design and support a curriculum." He sees three major obstacles that have thwarted curricular reform during the past decade:
  • Standoff between advocates of a core curriculum v. those who favor a multi-cultural curriculum.
  • Student careerism leading to enrollment in vocational rather than liberal arts majors.
  • Fragmentation of the disciplines leading to proliferation of courses representing faculty special interests.
Asserting that "no model curriculum exists for all institutions," Rhodes urges each faculty to get on with what ultimately must be a "do-it-yourself job. . .a homegrown product," whatever presidents, provosts, and trustees "may exhort" and consultants may advise. Rhodes suggests that the curriculum nurture these qualities in students:
  • Openness to others and the ability to communicate with clarity and precision.
  • Self-confidence and curiosity, with the skills required to satisfy both.
  • A sense of proportion and context in the worlds of nature and society.
  • Delight in the richness and variety of human experience and expression.
  • Intellectual mastery and passion in one chosen area.
  • A commitment to responsible citizenship, including respect for and an ability to get along with others.
  • A sense of direction, with the self-discipline, personal values, and moral conviction to pursue it.

Look for Rhodes' new book, The Creation of the Future: The Role of the American University, just published by Cornell University Press.

Sir John Daniels on "Lessons from the Open University"

Sir John Daniels, former president of the United States Open University and former vice chancellor of the Open University in Britain, is an especially insightful commentator on the uses of technology for instructional purposes. His "Point of View" article in the September 7 Chronicle Review gives away its thesis in the part of the title after the colon: "Low-Tech Learning Often Works Best." One of the great traps in the discussion of online technology, he says, is the tendency to overestimate the impact in the short-term and underestimate its long-term effects. Two examples have been assertions that online learning would sweep away books and campuses. Neither is happening. Even at Britain's Open University the approach has always been an evolving blend of multi-media materials, never exclusively an online approach.

What has been learned, he says, with Open University increasing its enrollment from 60,000 to 150,000 students between 1999 and 2001, is that students turn to new technology for specific services—administrative services, obtaining documents, communicating with faculty and peers—much more than they do to study course material. Nor do faculty prefer grading online, wishing to comment directly in the text or margin of what students have written. And, only 30% of students register online because they want an advisor's reassurance about their course choices. Yet, interactive services such as computer conferencing have dramatically increased.

  back to the top  |  e-mail us  |  anac bulletin home