|
In the Review section of the February 2
Chronicle of Higher Education ("Where Are College Presidents'
Voices on Important Public Issues?"), Rev. Theodore M. Hesburgh,
retired president of Notre Dame University, lamented that college
presidents no longer speak out on social issues. At least in part
he suggested that this absence of moral leadership reflected a timidity
among current presidents. The March 9 letters section of the Review
contains a response from James R. Appleton, president of the University
of Redlands, that reflects the close ties ANAC member institutions
have with the local and regional communities where they are located.
Wrote President Appleton: "I would like to contest the Rev. Theodore
Hesburgh's essay. It represents the opinion of an educational giant
of his day who likely no longer meets frequently with today's presidents
and is not aware of the network that continues among us, or the
work we do through our professional associations and in our local
areas. It also represents the view of the rare president who had
a cadre of colleagues within his institution who enabled him to
spend his time outside of the university and the fray of daily institutional
leadership. For him to speak now on behalf of the presidents of
the academy at large is quite misleading.
I assert that today's college and university presidents are actually
more active in the political arena, recognizing thatexcept
for the few strong voices from the elite institutions of our nationwe
can be more productive in working with our local and regional business
and political partners in improving the social, environmental, and
cultural milieu of this nation. I accept his belief that we are
custodians of institutions where independent, ethical, and compassionate
thinking must flourish, but this starts at home and then moves from
local to regional, and occasionally to national and international
issues."
Woodrow
Wilson Foundation Announces Pew-funded Responsive Ph.D. Initiative
As a follow-up to the "Re-envisioning the
Ph.D." project it funded during 1999-2000 that culminated in a national
conference in Seattle a year ago, The Pew Charitable Trusts have
awarded a grant to the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation
to undertake a project titled "The Responsive Ph.D." This new grant
will enable Woodrow Wilson to work with doctorate-granting universities
in testing innovative new doctoral programs responsive to the demands
of Ph.D. employers, the roles of Ph.D.'s in modern society, and
the complaints of doctoral students themselves. Many of the recommendations
that the project will consider grow out of the 2000 Seattle conference
which brought together for the first time the academic, government,
and private sector employers of Ph.D.'s; doctoral students; graduate
school faculty and administrators; and national higher education
associations to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of doctoral
education and how improvements might me made.
ANAC has more than a neutral interest in the outcomes of this project.
Representative particularly of the Masters I and II sectors of higher
education, the largest employer of new Ph.D. faculty, ANAC members
have a large stake in the capabilities and aspirations of the new
faculty they employ. Especially important are the extent that new
faculty understand the mission, expectations, and faculty professional
model of ANAC colleges and universities and share values that will
result in their personal and professional satisfaction in a comprehensive
institution. ANAC is in the process of preparing a statement of
the qualities and character its members seek in new faculty as a
way of communicating both with doctoral-granting institutions and
new faculty candidates interested in careers at ANAC colleges and
universities.
|